Persons who are internally displaced (IDPs) often become refugees in other countries as they move from their own country to others. Africa has about 11.8 million IDPs in about 21 countries of about an estimated global 24.5 million IDPs in 52 countries (Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internally_displaced_person). What is unfortunate about IDPs is that they are hardly recognised as ‘bonifide refugees’ as enshrined by the 1951 UN treaty and as a result are often neglected by the governments of the countries involved and almost all of the time, little or nothing is done to help them. IDPs have been described as “long-term poverty-stricken populations, neglected by authorities” (1). Such is the case of homeless Zimbabwean refugees in South Africa.
Women, children and refugees are usually the victims of sexual/physical and gender-based violence (SPGBV); they are affected in different ways and yet little evidence exists concerning SPGBV of refugees/IDPs in Africa. Too often, in their flight to safety, whether due to wars, or other reasons e.g. irresponsibilities of government leaders as in the case of Zimbabwe), they experience violence, abuse and exploitation based on their gender and helpless situation (2, 3) at the hands of those who are supposed to protect them; soldiers, border guards, immigration officers etc. (4, 5). According to the UNHCR, sexual exploitation of refugees (and IDPs) is widespread, occurs with impunity, people placed to care for them were perpetrators of the same abuse, and boys and girls were affected alike from the age of 5, while girls between 18 and 23 were the most frequently abused (6). Internally displaced women are more affected by violence against women than any other women’s population in the world and all refugee women are at risk of rape or other forms of sexual violence. Once women have fled their homes, they are further exposed to the risk of sexual violence and exploitation (7).
Sexual violence is regarded by the UN as one of the worst global protection challenges due to its scale, prevalence and profound impact (8). According to the Refugee Council (9), about half a million women were raped during the Rwandan genocide, more than 90% of women and girls over the age of three suffered sexual violence in parts of Liberia, while three out of four women have survived sexual violence in parts of Eastern Congo. The same report argues that between 4,000 and 10, 000 migrant women and girls are estimated to be sexually exploited in the United Kingdom (UK). Many of them report suffering physical and sexual violence before, during and after their journey to the UK. Arrival in the UK should signal safety, but refugee women are highly likely to belong to one or more of the groups that are at higher risk of rape than the UK average (5%). Poorer women are up to three times more likely to report being raped. Most refused asylum seekers are destitute, and many are homeless, further elevating the risk of sexual violence or exploitation. Why does this exploitation happen? Poverty, abuse of power, inequity and extreme disparity between caretakers and refugees leading to dependency (5, 6,), helplessness and hopelessness with consequences for poor mental health (9, 10) are all factors that have been explored to explain the phenomena.
The Sexual Violence Research Initiative cited in the Refugee Council (9) argues that existing research into sexual violence is limited, particularly in the developing world, because of a history of cultural taboos and lack of political leadership and as a result, huge gaps are reported in the literature.
Authors (11) have reported violence against women during conflicts. Unfortunately, despite the enormity of the problem facing these groups, research studies are scarce thereby creating serious knowledge gaps. In an attempt to close these gaps, this study therefore, attempts to address the following research questions: (1) What nature of abuse is experienced by Zimbabwean refugees?; (2) Who are the perpetrators?; (3) What are the sexes of the perpetrators?
The present study is part of a larger investigation concerning Zimbabwean refugees. One hundred and twenty five homeless Zimbabweans in South Africa responded to a questionnaire containing questions on demographic items and Post migration difficulties. The sample consisted of 125 homeless Zimbabweans in Polokwane (formerly known as Pietersburg) in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Polokwane serves as a passage route from Zimbabwe to other parts of South Africa. Participants were recruited via fliers that were posted on public sites and facilities such as non-governmental organization (NGO) buildings, shopping malls and other locations that were frequently visited by homeless Zimbabweans and the unemployed. Interested individuals came to a private room in a designated mall (Savannah Mall, Polokwane) where they were screened on eligibility for participation. The mean age of the participants was 28.3 years (range 18 to 49). The majority was male (57.6%). The mean length of stay in South Africa was 4.8 months.
Table 1 shows that about 56.8% of the victims were physically beaten while 52% were sexually harassed and 44% of men and women willingly negotiated their bodies for money, easy passages and other gains.
Table 1 Sexual/Physical abuses, behaviour type, perpetrators and sex of perpetrators
|Sell body for money||55||44.0|
From table 2 below it becomes clear that fondling (63.2%) followed by attempted rape (44.8%) were highly reported. On perpetrators, border officers (44.8%) and police (17.6%) were pointed out as the culprits of sexual and physical abuses of refugees in this study. Single males were in majority (54.4%) and in some cases these were jointly carried out.
Table 2: Type of behaviour, perpetrators and sex of perpetrators
|Type of behaviour|
|Relatives (Uncles, fathers etc)||15||12|
|Sex of Perpetrators|
|More than one Male||12||9.6|
|More than one Female||06||4.8|
From the findings of the study, the following conclusions can be made:
And based on this study, the following recommendations can be made:
Note that the views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of PHASA.
Be part of our network of leaders and innovators.Join now